Cool story about the Pope's daily schedule
Until 2005, under John Paul II, the papal apartment was run by Polish nuns. The memores aren't nuns, do not wear religious garments, are laypeople and live in the world. But this isn't the first time that lay housekeepers are allowed inside the papal apartment. In 1922, upon his election, Pope Pius XI demanded that his housekeeper follow him inside the Vatican. When he was told this might seem inappropriate and had no precedent, Pius cut it short: "I'll be the first one then," he was said to have responded. (See more international news in Global Spin.)
Also part of Benedict's pontifical family is his aide Paolo Gabriele, who waits at the table and helps the Pope during trips and public events.
A typical "Benedictine" day:
The Pope's day begins at 7 a.m. with Mass; one hour later breakfast is served. At 9 a.m. the Pope goes into his private study, the one where he recites the Angelus prayer every Sunday, speaking from the window overlooking St. Peter's Square. He does his work in the study, where another consecrated laywoman, Birgit, helps him in her role as secretary and typist — she can read Benedict's tiny handwriting better than anyone else. (See pictures of the Path of Pope Benedict XVI)
Following Birgit in the study is Gänswein, the Pope's secretary, to discuss the day's agenda. Typically, the Pontiff works until 11 a.m., when audiences, or meetings, begin. At 1:15 p.m. lunch is served, with the secretaries and the memores sitting at the table with Benedict.
After a brief stroll in the roof garden, the Pope rests, to return to his private study at 4 p.m. He says the rosary and then resumes his work. After a prayer, dinner is served at 7:30 p.m., in time to watch the 8 p.m. newscast on RAI, the Italian state broadcaster. An hour later, the Pope says good night and retires, though he works some more before going to sleep.




2 Comments:
Deborah
I posted a comment to your article in the B.C. Catholic: "Bishop Raymond Lahey’s child pornography trial expected to reopen wounds," but since I could not find your email address, I decided to send you a comment here.
After the third paragraph, your article neatly deflects attention from Lahey and the heinous crime for which he is accused. The article focuses on clerical abuse, suggests that clerical abusers won't get a fair trial and blames the laity for for failing to love and support the priests, which of course, the article suggests, caused priests to abuse children and possess and distribute child pornography.
Raymond Lahey betrayed the people in the Diocese of Antigonish and this article is an insult to Catholics in the Antigonish Diocese and all over the world.
Comment Permalink
Dear Veronica,
When a case is before the courts, we must be very careful not to say things that could prejudice the outcome of a fair trial.
In Canada we still operate under the principle of the presumption of innocence. My article is not about Bishop Lahey per se but about concerns by some observers about the need for renewal, though from different perspectives.
Thank you for commenting,
Deborah
Comment Permalink
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
« Home