Deborah Gyapong

Friday, February 03, 2012

Mark Steyn on the shakedown of Komen


As Sen. Obama said during the 2008 campaign, words matter. Modern "liberalism" is strikingly illiberal; the high priests of "tolerance" are increasingly intolerant of even the mildest dissent; and those who profess to "celebrate diversity" coerce ever more ruthlessly a narrow homogeneity. Thus, the Obama administration's insistence that Catholic institutions must be compelled to provide free contraception, sterilization and abortifacients. This has less to do with any utilitarian benefit a condomless janitor at a Catholic school might derive from Obamacare, and more to do with the liberal muscle of Big Tolerance enforcing one-size-fits-all diversity.
and

 After 72 hours being fitted for the liberals' cement overcoat and an honored place as the cornerstone of the Planned Parenthood Monument to Women's Choice, Komen attempted to chisel free and back into the good graces of the tolerant: As Nancy Brinker's statement groveled, "We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women's lives."
Congratulations! Planned Parenthood certainly raised Nancy's awareness. I wonder what color ribbon that comes with? Black and blue?
The Wall Street Journal's James Taranto was unimpressed by the liberal protection racket (Nice little charity you've got there; be a shame if anything were to happen to it). As Taranto pointed out, in a real-life protection racket, the victim never pays voluntarily: "The threat is present from the get-go." By contrast, Komen's first donations to Big Abortion were made voluntarily. A prudent observer would conclude that the best way to avoid being crowbarred by Cecile Richards is never to get mixed up with her organization in the first place. 

Thursday, February 02, 2012

Go Rick Santorum!!!!

He is the best of the lot running so far.  Here are some excerpts from an interview with Hugh Hewitt (HH):


RS: No, it’s true. I look at the American health care system, and I have always said one of the reasons I decided to run for president was because of Obamacare, and because of the government taking over health care. And I have stories from Canada and from Europe of children like my daughter, who simply are refused care because they just don’t see them as a life worth living, not a good use of government dollars, because she won’t be able to give back anything economically to the country. And that’s a tragedy. It’s a devaluing of human life. And I see that in our current health care system.

-snip-

HH: Now Rick Santorum, obviously you do need money to win against Romney. www.ricksantorum.comis running a money bomb. Have donations fallen off? Or are they continuing to be as strong as they have been since Iowa?
RS: Hugh, we had our best day yesterday. I mean, that’s almost remarkable to report.

-snip-

HH: Now I want to talk to you about two substantive issues, Senator Santorum. The first are these new regulations from the Obama administration. I read the letter from Archbishop Olmstead of Phoenix on the air. Archbishop Jose Gomez of Los Angeles has written a new article in First Things. It’s shocking, actually, what’s going on. Should this be a centerpiece of whoever the nominee’s campaign is?
RS: I talked about it in every speech I’ve given today. And here’s what I said, though, Hugh. I said that I took issue with the Catholic Bishops Conference, because Hugh, you may remember, they embraced Obamacare.
HH: Yes.
RS: They embraced it and said…here’s what I said to them. Be careful when you have government saying that they can give you rights, that you have a right to health care, and government’s going to give you something, because once you are now dependant on government, they, not only can they take that right away, they can tell you how to exercise that right, and you can either like it or not. And that’s the problem. That’s what the Catholic Bishops Conference didn’t get, that there’s no free lunch here, folks. If you’re going to give people secular power, then they’re going to use it in a secular fashion. And that’s why, you know, I hate to say it, but you know, you had it coming. And it’s time to wake up and realize that government isn’t the answer to the social ills. It’s people of faith, and it’s families, and it’s communities, and it’s charities that need to do this as it has in America so successfully for so long.
HH: Rick Santorum, what do you advise Catholic hospitals, Catholic colleges, Catholic…the centers of poverty assistance, the adoption agencies? What do you advise them to do in the face of, as Archbishop Olmstead said, we cannot comply with this unjust law?
RS: Civil disobedience. This will not stand. There’s no way they can make this stand. The Supreme Court, eventually, this thing’s going to get to the Supreme Court just like the ministerial hiring issue that was just decided by the Supreme Court the other day. And it was a 9-0 decision that said the Obama administration can’t roll over people of faith when it comes to hiring. Yet in the face of that decision, this radical, secular government of Barack Obama continues to have faith be the least important of the 1stAmendment. And I just think they fight. They fight in the courts, and they fight by civil disobedience, and go to war with the federal government over this one.

What is the CBC doing with our tax dollars?

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Binks raises important 'net privacy concerns

A fresh new Binks offering is up, and includes this scary stuff:

In an evil move that must concern freespeechers, privacy activists, and anybody who doesn’t like powerful software & websites all up in their bizniss, Google is going to mind your online activities via their sites, and you have no privacy-opt-out choice. GoogleCorp had already slid this modus operandi under the radar with their popular Chrome Browser, assinging individual IDs to users, and recording their online activity. Now, the Google search-engine, Youtube, GMail, AdWords, and the many-tentacled mass of other Google products and sites will all be collecting data on you, personally. Via ComputerWorld:
“What has the blogosphere and some users in an uproar is that Google isn’t offering users an opt-out option. If you don’t want your information from Gmail, YouTube and Google searches combined into one personal data store that can paint a detailed picture of you, the only option is to stop using Google’s services.”
It all starts March 1st.

Already Evilling

GoogleCorp is a corporation with inappropriate & cosy ties to the radical Obama administration; it has in the past helped with the Great Firewall of China (blocking traffic & content into & out of China); Google Earth data-catching was sweeping up passwords, private info, and illegal content; Google Corp has also been fined $500 million by the U.S. Government for criminal activity connected with the online drug market. That is, despite the founders’ motto “Don’t Be Evil”, the temptations of money, political power, and collaboration with repressive regimes has been a sweet, sweet opportunity for evil.
Now, it’s ‘No Opt Out’. Well, if you want to use their products, that is. All freedom-loving Netizens should respond by refusing to use Google (except via anonymizer websites like Scroogle), cancel Gmail (I’m moving over to Yahoo), use SRWare’s spyware-free Chrome-copy Iron browser instead of Chrome (yes, it supports Angry Birds), use Bing or any other engine for searches, and off-dump any browser or desktop-intrusive Google products for free substitutes available everywhere online. And yes, the snooping also includes the new Google+.

But Binky!, You Say

“But Binky,” you say, “you’re an international elf of mystery– we’re just using FaceBook and GMail and sending e-mails and browsing Amazon and eBay and kitten-picture sites. What’s the big?”
The big? One company not only wants to be your gateway to the web, but install itself all over your computer– and watch you.
Much more on a range of interesting subjects.


Covenant relationships must be respected

Crown, First Nations’ covenants must be retained


Written by Deborah Gyapong, Canadian Catholic News Monday, 30 January 2012 11:14
Assembly of First Nations National Chief Shawn Atleo and Prime Minister Stephen Harper process into Crown-First Nations Gathering Jan. 24. Assembly of First Nations National Chief Shawn Atleo and Prime Minister Stephen Harper process into Crown-First Nations Gathering Jan. 24. - Photo by Deborah Gyapong
OTTAWA - The historic Crown-First Nations Gathering revealed stark differences on how the relationship between Canada’s founding peoples and the government, embodied in the Indian Act, should continue.

And whatever is resolved, an advisor to the Catholic Church said, must re-affirm historic treaties signed between the two.

It is about recognizing the sacred importance of covenants, said Gerry Kelly at the one-day gathering held in Ottawa Jan. 24. Kelly is the former director of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops’ secretariat on aboriginal affairs and now advises Catholic entities regarding the Indian Residential Schools legacy.

“Our whole understanding of our relationship with God is understood scripturally in terms of covenants,” said Kelly. “We understand what it means. A covenant is sacred. We can’t hold that position and not recognize the covenant relationship established by treaties. It is timeless and it is binding.”


The rest at The Catholic Register

The battle for religious freedom in Ontario



Education Minister Laurel Broten rejects Catholic trustees’ policy statement


Written by Deborah Gyapong, Canadian Catholic News Tuesday, 31 January 2012 11:32
Education Minister Laurel Broten is insisting that Catholic schools permit single-issue clubs such as gay-straight alliances despite the OCSTA’s outright rejection of such groups in a long-awaited document titled Respecting Differences. Education Minister Laurel Broten is insisting that Catholic schools permit single-issue clubs such as gay-straight alliances despite the OCSTA’s outright rejection of such groups in a long-awaited document titled Respecting Differences.
 
A battle is looming between the Ontario government and Catholic schools after the Education Minister rejected a key component of a new anti-bullying policy from the Ontario Catholic School Trustees’ Association (OCSTA).

Laurel Broten is insisting that Catholic schools permit single-issue clubs such as gay-straight alliances despite the OCSTA’s outright rejection of such groups in a long-awaited document titled Respecting Differences.

Released Jan. 25, Respecting Difference affirms the Catholic identity of Catholic schools by stating that all clubs and activities must be “respectful of and consistent with Catholic teaching.” The document follows the Accepting Schools Act introduced last November by the minority Liberal government of Dalton McGuinty that would require all schools to accommodate gay-straight alliances or similar clubs under a different name.
“We’ve been absolutely crystal clear that we expect students to participate in groups and have the issues important to them talked about,” Broten said in a Jan. 30 interview from Toronto.

“I do feel very confident that Catholic boards will be able to operationalize the expectations we have set out consistent with Catholic education. We all have a responsibility to make sure all of our students and in this circumstance, we’re talking about our gay and lesbian students, or our students who come from families with two moms and two dads. It’s important every one of those students be accepted and welcomed in our schools.”

Broten agreed with the OCSTA document’s goals to combat bullying and said it contains “some very wonderful language.” But Broten said her policy is outlined in her anti-bullying Bill 13, introduced last November, a bill the Catholic Civil Rights League, the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada and other groups said threatens religious freedom and denominational rights.

More at The Catholic Register

Monday, January 30, 2012

Do you believe in Mom?

Sunday, January 29, 2012

The doves that would not go home!

I love this story:


VATICAN CITY - A pair of doves seemed to prefer the company of Pope Benedict XVI to the great outdoors on Sunday when he had trouble convincing them to take flight in a traditional peace gesture.
The first dove hesitated on the windowsill of the pope's Vatican apartment for a long spell before flying off, while the second flew back into the room before flying out again.
"They want to stay in the pope's home," Benedict said, flanked by two children.


Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Pope+peace+doves+slow+taste+freedom/6069248/story.html#ixzz1ktvrU4qE


A white dove, who looked like Central Casting had selected him to play the Holy Spirt in a Hollywood movie, landed in my garden many years ago and stuck around.  He arrived in the summer when the impatiens were blooming and he would strut around, chest all puffed out, among the flowers. He loved unpopped popcorn and would eat out of my hand.  When I would return home from work, he would land on the door of my car as I opened it, wings backlit, gorgeous, as I grabbed my gym bag to come in.   He would be quite demanding though, insisting I feed him.

Winter came, and Dave---that's what my son named him---was still holding his vigil on the garage roof.  I just loved this bird. He had so much personality and you could see his bird brain working---if he spied the jar that had popcorn in it, he would prefer to eat from that than from my hand, as as soon as his head was inside the jar, and he didn't see me, well, I wasn't there.  Smart!


And he left credentials the size of quarters on the sidewalk and all over the garage roof, and that didn't make my husband happy.  One day he caught him in his hands and asked me if I wanted to keep him, and if so, I should cage him, because he was not going to put up with the offal all over the place.  Otherwise he threatened to put him in a pot and cook him!

So, I found a family that would be willing to take Dave, feed him, keep him in their backyard.  I drove him over to another part of Kanata, and left him.

Then a couple of days later I got a phone call.  Dave had escaped.  He had squeezed around someone's hand while his water and food was being attended to.  Oh well.  But then, a day or two after that, I heard cooing.  I saw little pigeon prints in the snow.  And there he was!  Dave came home!

If you love something, let it go.  If it comes back to you . . . .you know the cliche.

I tried again, tricking him with popcorn to get back in the cage.   But he escaped again and came home.  So the family gave up.

I brought him to the Wild Bird Care outfit and they found a home for him.  I brought him there and he got out of his cage and perched on the back of an office chair.  People walked by and Dave, cool as he was, just edged over a bit, otherwise unfazed.  Such an awesome bird.



Saturday, January 28, 2012

Some of my faves from my evangelical days



Found myself singing this in the car last night.

And trying to remember this one

Friday, January 27, 2012

He's Brother Robert Mercer now

But he will always be Bishop Robert to me.  He was received into the Catholic Church on Jan. 7 as a simple, humble lay man.   What a treasure he is and will be.  Here's one of his writings.  He made time stand still when he prayed the Mass or preached.  Heaven came to earth.  We were so blessed to have him.


Sin, Salvation, the End of Man


A Homily by Bishop Mercer
“Keep before you an outline of the sound teaching”
(II Timothy 1,13).
Christianity is about relationships.
Christianity is not primarily about a book, though there is a whole library called The Bible, Greek for books, orScriptures, Latin for writings, which is of immense importance to us.
Christianity is not primarily about rules and regulations though there are 10 commands, neatly summarized into 2, which are of immense importance to us .
Christianity is not primarily about doing good or about being good, though if our concern is with relationships,the difference between right and wrong is of immense importance to us.
Christianity is not primarily about knowledge or understanding, though if our concern is relationships, then a measure of knowledge and understanding is of immense importance to us.
I repeat: from first to last Christianity is about relationships.
And the first and foremost Relationship is calledGod. Within one God are relationships. There is a self consciousBeing called the First Person. From Him derives another self­consciousBeing called the Second Person. They have taught us to think of the relationship between Them as akin to, though not exactly parallel with, the relationship between a father and his son. From the relationship between this Father and this Son derives another self conscious Being called the Third Person. They have taught us to think of Him as the Spirit. For this one God we have ourselves,perhaps under the Spirit’s inspiration, coined a new word, Trinity,from the Latin, three one. There are other ways of thinking of this Trinity: Lover, Beloved, the Love between Them. Or God, HisWord or Self-Expression or Self­Revelation, His Spirit.
God creates the universe from nothing. And here comes the next relationship. As part of creation God invents man, whom oddly enough, God describes as being in His own image. Odd, because in some ways man is in the image of brute beasts: like pigs, we eat; like dogs, we dream; like chimpanzees, we play games; like birds and fish, we reproduce and die. But God gives to man self-consciousness;the ability to reason, the ability to reason about right and wrong;the ability to know the difference between good and evil; the ability to choose the right. God gives to man participation in relationships. No one human is ever sufficient or complete in and of himself. We need others in order to survive, in order tobe. We love and we are loved. A male and female love. From their love other humans derive. We call this derivation family. But we share in ever­widening rings of “relationship”.We call other humans grandparents, ancestors, uncles, aunts, cousins,children, friends, teachers, pupils, clients, customers, craftsmen,nurses, and so on. Our happinesses come from knowing and loving other humans. Our sadnesses come from ruined, broken, quarrelsome relationships with other humans, or from severed relationships by way of death. God made man for relationship: God made man inHis own image. If the first and foremost relationship is God,the second and derived relationship is mankind, humanity.
And the second exists in order to relate to the first.Man is here to know and love God, more importantly, to be loved by God. Here in this life we are to relate to God. But this short life is the entry to a fuller life after death, just as life in the womb is entry to a fuller life outside of our mothers. In the next phase we shall have an even better time loving and being loved by God and, incidentally, loving one another.
But there’s a snag to this idyllic swirl of loving relationships. The snag is called the fall, sin, or original sin.Ruined, broken, quarrelsome relationships. Severed relationships by way of death. Our knowledge of the difference between good and evil is impaired. But even when we do know the difference,we have a compulsion to do the wrong. I can’t forgive. I won’t forgive. I’ll kill. I’ll conquer, bully, steal. Need I go on?We all know about life together. Our human life together is made miserable by self­deception, deceit towards others, selfishness,aggression.
The result of sin is twofold. We are on the outs with each other. We are on the outs with God. There is still relationship,but it’s impaired. What’s to be done?
God’s way of healing broken relationships, God’s way of reconciling man to God, of reconciling man to man, is byway, yes, you’ve guessed ­ by way of relationship.
God the Trinity gives us the Second Person called the Son. And to facilitate this special relationship the Son became man, became one of us. If we put our trust in Him, if we entera specially intimate relationship with the Son, so intimate that we are described as ‘in Christ’, part of Christ, Christ’s body,Christ’s wife, then in Christ we shall be restored to the wholeTrinity: we shall be restored to each other. Because of Christ’s tender love for us, called grace, we shall be able to love, to forgive, to say no to sinful impulses, to know the difference between right and wrong, to choose the right. This slow improvement of our inadequate selves is called growth in grace, or sanctification,though it involves suffering. When the Son Himself became manin order to give Himself to us at our level, man responded bykilling the Son. If, as part of the Son we become like the Son,there’s a good chance man will kill us too!
Remember, relationships: not mechanisms, not magic,not manipulations. In a personal relationship you can not manipulate anybody to your ends, by saying words, or performing mechanistic actions. Prayer, Bible study, sacraments, all other activities like fasting or almsgiving, are to be understood in terms of relationships,not of magic. It is inhuman to say things like, “Prayer works”. It doesn’t. What we mean is that God loves and understands and that we respond by turning to Him in trust. Thou and I. Outward acts, a kiss, a smile, a friendly wave, are expressions of an inward meaning, not methods for controlling God or for controlling man.
God and man: sin, salvation, grace and penitence:the true end of man. What I’ve done in this talk now is obfuscate the creeds. If you want an excellent summary of the whole Christian faith, of the whole Bible, don’t listen to me. Turn to your PrayerBooks, turn to what you already know by heart. There is a statement about sin, salvation, grace and penitence, the true end of man,nicknamed the Apostles’ Creed. There is a slightly longer statement nicknamed the Creed of Nicaea. And there is a much longer statement nicknamed the Creed of St. Athanasius. This last is full of detail about the relationships among the Father, the Son and the HolySpirit within the Godhead. Also about the relationship withinChrist of His divine nature which He has ­from without beginning;and His human nature which He took of a human mother (she too is of immense importance to us). There is an even shorter summary of the whole Christian faith than the three creeds. St. Paul sums up the whole faith in just two words which he used over and over again: In Christ.
The important thing about Christianity is not to understand and know everything, but to relate to God in a loving personal relationship. And this we do by relationship with HimWho is both God and Man. A Christian is one who trusts Jesus,and who, trusting Jesus, is baptized into unity with Jesus, and who feeds on Jesus by way of bread and wine.
Christianity is about Christ.
+RM CR

I am besotted with the Angel Gabriel

Played by the most beautiful boy in the world at his Christmas pageant